JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.
Food delivery isn’t just a service—it’s a strategy. With delivery booming, restaurant owners need to decide: Should you run your own in-house delivery or go with third-party apps? It’s a decision that affects everything—your profits, customer experience, and how your brand is perceived.
Third-party platforms like Uber Eats and DoorDash can get your food to a much larger audience, but they come with high commission fees and little control over how customers experience your brand.
According to McKinsey, the food delivery market has tripled since 2017, hitting an estimated $150 billion globally in 2021. Despite this massive growth, profitability remains a major challenge, as commission fees eat into revenue.
In-house delivery gives you full control—from the way your food is packed to the interaction customers have with your delivery team. But it also means investing in drivers, vehicles, and logistics. Many restaurant owners are now weighing whether to invest in their own delivery infrastructure or continue relying on services like Uber Eats and DoorDash.
So, how do you decide? Let’s break down the pros and cons of each approach so you can make informed decisions that align with your business goals, budget, and customer service expectations.
Managing in-house delivery means hiring drivers, organizing logistics, and handling everything from order placement to drop-off. The upside? You control every aspect of the customer experience, ensuring that your food reaches customers just the way you want it to.
With in-house delivery, you get:
Challenges:
Many restaurants invest in fleet management software to optimize delivery routes and reduce operational headaches. However, setting up in-house delivery should be something to incorporate into your business plan as it will require management and more money upfront.
Services like Uber Eats, DoorDash, and Grubhub provide a plug-and-play system for restaurants. They handle logistics, payments, and delivery, making it easier to focus on food quality rather than operations.
What you’ll get:
The drawbacks:
Delivery thrives in urban areas where customers prioritize convenience. If you’re in a high-density city, delivery demand will likely be strong. In suburban or rural areas, customers may prefer picking up their orders.
Not all restaurants are built for delivery. Fast-casual spots and comfort food concepts tend to do well, as their menu items travel well and maintain quality during transit. High-end fine dining, on the other hand, may struggle, as intricate plating and temperature-sensitive dishes can lose their appeal in takeout containers. However, some fine dining establishments have adapted by curating takeout experiences that replicate the in-restaurant dining feel.
For example, Michelin-starred Casa Enrique in NYC partners with DoorDash, offering a delivery menu designed to maintain its high-quality experience, including cocktail pairings and specialty packaging.
Before jumping into delivery, consider who your customers are and what they want. According to TouchBistro’s 2023 Diner Trends Report:
If your restaurant serves a younger, convenience-driven audience—like busy professionals, students, or families—delivery could be a major revenue driver. Research customer preferences and consider surveying your current diners to understand their expectations when it comes to delivery services.
Commission Fees
None
20-30% per order
Driver Salaries
Fixed cost
Included in fees
Vehicle Costs
High upfront & ongoing
Logistics
Managed by you
Handled by app
Marketing
Your responsibility
Built-in exposure
Payment Fees
2-4% per transaction
Included in commission
If you’re looking for rapid growth, broad exposure, and a lower upfront investment, third-party apps are a great way to get started. They provide instant access to a larger customer base and eliminate the need for hiring drivers or managing logistics. However, if maximizing profits and maintaining complete control over food quality and customer experience is your top priority, in-house delivery might be the better long-term strategy.
Many restaurants find success with a hybrid model, using third-party delivery apps to acquire new customers while encouraging repeat customers to order directly through their own delivery system. This approach helps maintain visibility on popular platforms while reducing commission fees on returning customers.
Restaurants employing this strategy often use exclusive discounts or loyalty programs for direct orders, enticing customers to skip third-party platforms in favor of in-house delivery. Additionally, branding efforts—such as custom packaging, direct marketing, and personalized follow-ups—can help build stronger customer relationships while keeping delivery costs under control.
By combining the best of both worlds, a hybrid approach allows you to reach a broader audience while gradually transitioning to a more profitable and sustainable in-house delivery system.
DoorDash
15-30%
6%
Higher-tier plans for more exposure
Premium placement in app
Uber Eats
Marketing tools & loyalty programs
Priority search placement
Grubhub
Advertising costs for featured listings
Increased visibility programs
Postmates (Uber Eats)
30%
Premium placement fees
Smaller market share
Caviar (DoorDash)
20-30%
12%
Higher commission but targets high-end dining
Premium audience
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The right choice depends on your business goals, budget, and customer base. Before making a decision, crunch the numbers and consider what makes the most sense for your restaurant.
Whether you go all-in on in-house delivery or partner with third-party apps, the key is ensuring that customers have a seamless and satisfying experience—because at the end of the day, that’s what keeps them coming back.